In a world where harboring your most sensitive data on the internet is a convenient risk that everyone seems willing to take, the ramifications could actually be much more alarming than a stolen credit card number — cyber attacks could dismantle society.According to this year’s Worldwide Threat Assesment, written by Daniel R. Coats, the Director of U.S. National Intelligence, cyber attacks are the top danger to society, posing more of a global threat than mass destruction and terrorism.Download our free guide here to uncover 10 SEO mistakes to avoid in your next redesign.“The potential for surprise in the cyber realm will increase in the next year and beyond as billions more digital devices are connected — with relatively little built-in security — and both nation states and malign actors become more emboldened and better equipped in the use of increasingly widespread cyber toolkits.” Coats writes in his report.As individuals and companies rely more heavily on internet-connected devices that have notoriously weak security, and cybercriminals continue to develop more sophisticated methods of attack, like fileless malware, which caused Equifax’s infamous data breach last year, cyber attacks are becoming more prevalent and dangerous than ever before — especially in the business world.In 2017, the Identity Theft Resource Center reported a record-high 1,579 data breaches — 44.7% more incidents than the previous record high recorded just one year before. Ponemon Institute, a research center dedicated to privacy, data protection, and information security policy, also reported that a single ransomware attack inflicted on a company that doesn’t even pay the ransom payment will cost them $5 million in lost productivity, due to the disruption of the company’s networks and computers.With malicious viruses costing companies huge sums of money and skyrocketing growth in data breaches every year, it might seem like cybercrime laws are too flimsy to deter hackers. But in some states, certain cybercrimes are considered Class C felonies, which is equal to kidnapping and arson.Unfortunately, cyber investigators are spread so thin that they only have time to work on cases that receive a lot of media attention, affect government officials or celebrities, or lead to a loss of $200,000 or more. As a result, breaking a serious law doesn’t make cybercriminals flinch even one bit. So how are companies securing themselves if order can’t?Protecting a company’s cybersecurity requires the same skills as exploiting it. And to quickly find their own vulnerabilities and patch them up, businesses pay people to hack into their computer systems. It’s something called ethical hacking.What is ethical hacking?Ethical hacking is when companies, organizations, and government agencies hire white-hat hackers to identify vulnerabilities in their computer systems and help fix them instead of exploiting them.Most companies connect with freelance white-hat hackers through platforms like HackerOne and BugCrowd and offer them monetary rewards, called bug bounties, in exchange for information about their previously unknown vulnerability. Bug bounties can range anywhere from hundreds of dollars to tens of thousands. In fact, Google will pay you up to $23,000 if you find a certain type of bug in their computer systems.A budding industry, the technology, government, telecommunications, automotive, and healthcare sectors all saw increases in bug bounty programs this year. HackerOne has also helped white-hat hackers earn over 31 million dollars in bug bounties since their inception in 2012, and computer science students at universities like Cal Berkeley use the platform to earn points toward their final grades in their security classes.The growth of ethical hacking is promising for the cybersecurity industry. It’s incentivizing the rare few who can hack into complex computer systems to use their technical chops for good. And hopefully, it’ll spark enough opportunity to help the light side of hacking shine brightly over the dark. Originally published Dec 5, 2018 6:00:00 AM, updated December 05 2018 Topics: Website Development Don’t forget to share this post!
New Delhi: All government hospitals in Delhi, including the premier ones like AIIMS and Safdarjung, should issue medical fitness certificates to armed forces recruits only after examining the medical standards required for the job, the Delhi High Court has said. The court said the medical certificates should clearly state that the doctor issuing the document has examined the medical reports adverse to the candidate or patient and that he or she is aware of the requirements of medical standards for the post concerned. Also Read – Bangla Sahib Gurudwara bans use of all types of plastic itemsIt said the doctor should clearly mention the reasons for not agreeing with the findings of the previous report issued by the medical board. “The name and designation of the doctor issuing such certificate should also be clearly disclosed in the certificate. Only if such certificates are issued, they should be placed before the court and may be relied upon by the candidates to persuade this Court to examine the matter,” a bench of Justices Vipin Sanghi and Rajnish Bhatnagar said. Also Read – After eight years, businessman arrested for kidnap & murderThe court said this direction should be communicated to the Medical Superintendents of all government hospitals in Delhi for “strict compliance”. The court was hearing a petition by a candidate who was interviewed to join the Military Academy and was declared unfit after medical check up by the medical board. The man said he was advised by various ENT specialists that his medical condition was fully curable after which he underwent a surgery at Ram Manohar Lohia (RML) Hospital. He was again declared medically unfit by the appellate medical board and review medical board after which he got himself examined at AIIMS and RML Hospital. The ENT specialists at both the hospitals declared him medically fit and fully cured of the medical condition which was found by the authorities, the plea said. He made representation to the authorities for medical re-examination but did not receive any response and filed the petition in the court. Central government standing counsel Ajay Digpaul and Lt Col Kapil Pandya, also a doctor, explained to the court the man’s medical condition and said despite the surgery, if the petitioner is subjected to rigorous conditions such as in war zones, he may not be able to withstand the sound trauma generated by the firearms and ammunition. The court said it was not inclined to interfere with the rejection of the man’s candidature on account of his medical unfitness.